Is It A Baby or Not?

    I know, abortion has been discussed and discussed ..but  I have personally found most people invest too much of their own agenda into the discussion, so an honest and thoughtful debate is rarely to be found and usually disintegrates into name calling and finger pointing.
    There are Christians who believe that abortion is totally wrong.  Liberal America (51% of American by Obama's vote) are all about pro-abortion, stem cell research, genetic research and all of the perk's that go along with an abortion. As a medical professional,  I tend to shy away from this topic because I do not want the discussion to be merely about conservative religious viewpoints, and liberal talking points on women's rights.
    Most laws going through Congress and eventually signed into law, are by nature, rather conservative or moderate.  Very left leaning liberals get quite frustrated with this process.  To make matters worse, the conservatives ruled the roost for many years.  The liberal views just could not get out through the standard process. That process being, electing an official, have him post a bill, bring it to a vote, and it becomes a law.  Without this avenue, most liberals work  to utilize the third branch of the government, the judicial system.  Judges are appointed for life and answer to no one.  For once, the simple majority doesn't matter.  If a liberal activist judge is appointed, there is nothing that can be said or done as a protest.  Decisions are made, and by precedence, becomes law.  What eventually got me started on this path was a controversial decisions recently made by a liberal judge.

    It seems that if a criminal  kills a woman in an act of violence, and later it is discovered that this woman was pregnant,  the criminal can be charged with two homicides?  How is this?  It seems that if a woman wants a baby or maybe she even had a difficult time getting pregnant, there is an investment of "human rights" to the unborn fetus. If the woman doesn't want the baby and wants to have an abortion on demand even if it is near the time of birth, then it is just a plain ole "fetus" with no rights at all. 
    This is one of the many conundrums, double standards, and unfair decisions  that liberals seem to continuously  propagate to further whatever cause they seem to be working on at the moment. And for some strange reason, this is accepted by all,  liberals and conservatives alike. 

      I prefer the democratic process to make decisions for the people. Lets all just vote in a referendum election or maybe we can actually elect officials to debate the issue for us. Only liberals tend to utilize an activist judge to get their point across... usually against the will of a majority of the people. This  problem leads me to ask?... can a fetus be defined objectively as a human being, only by the opinion of the woman who carries it? It seems that some people define a child by the same value as property.  That is it is considered an actual child only if it has value or worth by the original owner.  This is truly a sad state that we live in.